| by Kurt Vonnegut 
 
 Newspaper reporters and technical writers are trained to reveal  almost nothing about themselves in their writings. This makes them freaks in the  world of writers, since almost all of the other ink-stained wretches in that  world reveal a lot about themselves to readers. We call these revelations,  accidental and intentional, elements of style.  These revelations tell us as readers what sort of person it is  with whom we are spending time. Does the writer sound ignorant or informed,  stupid or bright, crooked or honest, humorless or playful– ? And on and on.  Why should you examine your writing style with the idea of  improving it? Do so as a mark of respect for your readers, whatever you're  writing. If you scribble your thoughts any which way, your readers will surely  feel that you care nothing about them. They will mark you down as an egomaniac  or a chowderhead — or, worse, they will stop reading you.  The most damning revelation you can make about yourself is that  you do not know what is interesting and what is not. Don't you yourself like or  dislike writers mainly for what they choose to show you or make you think about?  Did you ever admire an emptyheaded writer for his or her mastery of the  language? No.  So your own winning style must begin with ideas in your head.   1. Find a subject you care about      Find a subject you care about and which you in your heart  feel others should care about. It is this genuine caring, and not your games  with language, which will be the most compelling and seductive element in your  style.      I am not urging you to write a novel, by the way — although  I would not be sorry if you wrote one, provided you genuinely cared about  something. A petition to the mayor about a pothole in front of your house or a  love letter to the girl next door will do.  2. Do not ramble, though      I won't ramble on about that.  3. Keep it simple      As for your use of language: Remember that two great  masters of language, William Shakespeare and James Joyce, wrote sentences which  were almost childlike when their subjects were most profound. "To be or not to  be?" asks Shakespeare's Hamlet. The longest word is three letters long. Joyce,  when he was frisky, could put together a sentence as intricate and as glittering  as a necklace for Cleopatra, but my favorite sentence in his short story  "Eveline" is this one: "She was tired." At that point in the story, no other  words could break the heart of a reader as those three words do.      Simplicity of language is not only reputable, but perhaps  even sacred. The Bible opens with a sentence well within the writing skills of a  lively fourteen-year-old: "In the beginning God created the heaven and the  earth."  4. Have guts to cut      It may be that you, too, are capable of making necklaces  for Cleopatra, so to speak. But your eloquence should be the servant of the  ideas in your head. Your rule might be this: If a sentence, no matter how  excellent, does not illuminate your subject in some new and useful way, scratch  it out.  5. Sound like yourself      The writing style which is most natural for you is bound to  echo the speech you heard when a child. English was Conrad's third language, and  much that seems piquant in his use of English was no doubt colored by his first  language, which was Polish. And lucky indeed is the writer who has grown up in  Ireland, for the English spoken there is so amusing and musical. I myself grew  up in Indianapolis, where common speech sounds like a band saw cutting  galvanized tin, and employs a vocabulary as unornamental as a monkey wrench.       In some of the more remote hollows of Appalachia, children  still grow up hearing songs and locutions of Elizabethan times. Yes, and many  Americans grow up hearing a language other than English, or an English dialect a  majority of Americans cannot understand.      All these varieties of speech are beautiful, just as the  varieties of butterflies are beautiful. No matter what your first language, you  should treasure it all your life. If it happens to not be standard English, and  if it shows itself when your write standard English, the result is usually  delightful, like a very pretty girl with one eye that is green and one that is  blue.      I myself find that I trust my own writing most, and others  seem to trust it most, too, when I sound most like a person from Indianapolis,  which is what I am. What alternatives do I have? The one most vehemently  recommended by teachers has no doubt been pressed on you, as well: to write like  cultivated Englishmen of a century or more ago.  6. Say what you mean      I used to be exasperated by such teachers, but am no more.  I understand now that all those antique essays and stories with which I was to  compare my own work were not magnificent for their datedness or foreignness, but  for saying precisely what their authors meant them to say. My teachers wished me  to write accurately, always selecting the most effective words, and relating the  words to one another unambiguously, rigidly, like parts of a machine. The  teachers did not want to turn me into an Englishman after all. They hoped that I  would become understandable — and therefore understood. And there went my dream  of doing with words what Pablo Picasso did with paint or what any number of jazz  idols did with music. If I broke all the rules of punctuation, had words mean  whatever I wanted them to mean, and strung them together higgledy-piggledy, I  would simply not be understood. So you, too, had better avoid Picasso-style or  jazz-style writing, if you have something worth saying and wish to be  understood.      Readers want our pages to look very much like pages they  have seen before. Why? This is because they themselves have a tough job to do,  and they need all the help they can get from us.  7. Pity the readers      They have to identify thousands of little marks on paper,  and make sense of them immediately. They have to read, an art so difficult that  most people don't really master it even after having studied it all through  grade school and high school — twelve long years.      So this discussion must finally acknowledge that our  stylistic options as writers are neither numerous nor glamorous, since our  readers are bound to be such imperfect artists. Our audience requires us to be  sympathetic and patient readers, ever willing to simplify and clarify — whereas  we would rather soar high above the crowd, singing like nightingales.      That is the bad news. The good news is that we Americans  are governed under a unique Constitution, which allows us to write whatever we  please without fear of punishment. So the most meaningful aspect of our styles,  which is what we choose to write about, is utterly unlimited.  8. For really detailed advice      For a discussion of literary style in a narrower sense, in  a more technical sense, I recommend to your attention The Elements of Style, by  William Strunk, Jr. and E.B. White. E.B. White is, of course, one of the most  admirable literary stylists this country has so far produced.      You should realize, too, that no one would care how well or  badly Mr. White expressed himself, if he did not have perfectly enchanting  things to say.  In Sum: 1. Find a subject you care about
 2. Do not  ramble, though
 3. Keep it simple
 4. Have guts to cut
 5. Sound like  yourself
 6. Say what you mean
 7. Pity the readers
 
 
 |